Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) has filed the application in the Supreme Court seeking CBI probe against Telecom Minister Kapil Sibal and Attorney General GE Vahanvati. Sibbal allegedly favored Reliance Infocom on the penalty over 2G licences, while Vahanvati bypassed rules to help former minister A Raja respectively.
Attorney General GE Vahanvati allegedly disregarded the Law Ministry in giving opinion to Raja on 2G spectrum when he was Solicitor General in UPA-I government.
The application filed by Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) alleged Sibal reduced the penalty to Rs. five Crore from Rs650 Crore against RCOM for violations in the Unified Access Service Licence (UASL) agreement.
The application filed in the Court says that Kapil Sibal abused his position as minister to over-rule the unanimous view taken by senior DoT officials including the Telecom Secretary, to benefit a private operator by closing the issue with only a penalty of Rs5 Crore instead of Rs650 Crore.
"This abuse of authority by him to benefit Anil Ambani controlled Reliance Infocomm needs a thorough investigation by the CBI
The application has attached documents to point that DoT officials said that Reliance group pay a penalty of Rs50 crore per circle for "violation of the terms and conditions of Universal Service Obligation Fund (USOF) agreement and UASL agreement by voluntary, unilateral and unauthorized switching-off/closure of services to subscribers from USOF sites without any notice."
The matter is likely to be heard on July 11
Universal Service Obligation Fund (USOF) is a fund used to subsidise rural telephony. Telecom operators can bid for providing this service, and even ask for subsidies.
But RCom bid aggressively for many USOF and later found them unviable and switched off without the USOF Administrator’s permission.
16 May, 2007
Under an agreement RCom had agreed to provide this service from base transceiver stations (BTSs) in 53 clusters (5,118 sites)
7 December 2010 –
RCOMM issued notice to that it was cutting off services with effect from the previous month (from November 22). The notice said that it was switching of all but 46 BTSs, and even these would be terminated in two or three months, and stop paying power and fuel bills to the infrastructure provider, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd (BSNL).
21 December, 2010
USOF issued show cause notice to RCOM.
USOF rejected all the reasons and arguments given by RCOM to stop the service and break the agreement.
“RCL (Reliance Communications) is in clear violation of the licence agreement as well as USOF agreement leading to disruption of continuity of service.
Also there is no provision for USP (universal service provider that is RCom) to unilaterally exit on his own from discharge of its performance obligations and go scot-free without performing.”
The show cause notice proposed fine of Rs. 50 Crore for One Circle.
For 13 Circles it will amount to Rs.650 Crore.
In Following 13 Circles rural telecom operations under USOF were shut by RCOM
1. Andhra Pradesh
2. Bihar
3. Jharkhand
4. Gujarat
5. Karnataka
6. Maharashtra
7. Madhya Pradesh
8. Punjab
9. Rajasthan
10. Tamil Nadu
11. Uttar Pradesh (East)
12. Uttarakhand
13. West Bengal
After this show cause notice by USOF reliance wanted time of six weeks to reply and USOF said first start the services.
USOF administrators said Reliance Should pay fine of Rs.50 Crore per Circle for stopping the services.
Director (Telecom), Advisor (Finance), Member (Finance) and Secretary (Telecom) everyone recommended a fine of Rs.50 Crore for One Circle.
On 2 February, 2011, Director (Telecom) signs an internal order proposing a penalty of Rs. 50 Crore from RCom in one circle.
By 9 February, everyone up the chain, up to the Telecom Secretary, had signed on the internal order endorsing the Rs. 50-crore penalty.
On 16 February, RCom writes to Kapil Sibal.
After that Telecom Minister Kapil Sibal reduced the fine of Rs. 50 Crore per Circle to just few lakh Rupees.
RCOM unilaterally switched off its BTSs but Telecom Minister Kapil Sibal treated this action of RCOM as a mere “interruption” of service and lowered the penalty.
Kapil Sibal did not go for Rs.650 Crore fine and a fine, Penalty was charged based on the number of days of service disruption at Rs. 500 a day.
And in this way the fine of Rs.650 Crore became Rs. 5.49 Crore in 13 circles.
Government do not have money for the subsidies, Government is reducing the subsidies on gas by saying No Money
Then question is Why the Penalties of Rich Companies are reduced by Government?
What is the reason Penalty is reduced?
By doing so Who benefited Government of India Servants or the citizens of India?
Just Think Do Not Ignore
Reality views by sm –
Keyword - News Finance Contract RCOM Kapil Sibal Penalty Rs.650 Crore 5 Crore Penalty Reduced
No comments:
Post a Comment