Showing posts with label India Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label India Law. Show all posts

Aug 20, 2011

Indian Judges will obey and will be under politicians – On the name of Judges appoint bill Government will take control of Judiciary

Indian Judges will obey and will be under politicians – On the name of Judges appoint bill Government will take control of Judiciary



current procedure of Appointing Judges in India is perfect and excellent that is the reason today we see now and then Supreme Court of India showing anger to all political parties including investigative agencies.





Currently politicians do not have right to appoint judges. This is the reason Good judges do not fear politicians and give the excellent judgments.



Currently judges appoint the judges thus judges do not fear political parties while giving judgments.



Once the appointment goes into the hands of Politicians NO one will dare to speak against political parties and government.



Now Indian government is planning to establish and set up a National Judicial Commission, which will comprise members from outside the judiciary to appoint, and oversee, the conduct of judges.



If passed, the Bill will ensure that judges to the Supreme and High Courts will now be appointed by the

Law Minister – that is a politician

The Leader of the Opposition – a politician

An eminent citizen chosen by the government – eminent citizen who will be a puppet of government and politicians.

In addition to the Chief Justice of India and two other top judges.

But in order for this to be done, an amendment needs to be made to the Constitution



We have seen how Mr. Thomas became chief and how Suprme Court removed him.



Now the judges like Thomas will be appointed by government and who obey government for promotions, who will become a puppet in the hands of government.



First the bill will go to cabinet where it must be approved and then it will be tabled in Parliament.



This is the request to Suprme Court of India this move by Politicians is not constitutional its direct attack on principal of separation of powers.



Thus Supreme Court of India should not allow this to happen in the interest of India and Indian citizens.



Reality views by sm



Tags – News Indian Judge Appointment National Judicial Commission



READ MORE - Indian Judges will obey and will be under politicians – On the name of Judges appoint bill Government will take control of Judiciary

Aug 17, 2011

Supreme Court dismisses PIL against criminal member of parliaments saying No Powers

Supreme Court dismisses PIL against criminal member of parliaments saying No Powers

An Advocate Manohar Lal Sharma filed a petition in Supreme Court of India and mentioned that out of 541 Members of Parliament, 154 members have criminal records and facing cases pending in various courts.



He demanded the suspension of MPs involved in any criminal case for the protection of house and citizen of India in the interest of justice.”



The petition stated that there is no provision about the prohibition of persons in any Act prohibiting them to stand for election and taking benefits of lack of legislation,”



In his Public Interest Litigation he demanded that Supreme Court should issue direction

To the centre to advise the President to suspend those Members of Parliament (MPs) facing criminal case.



A bench of Chief Justice SH Kapadia, Justice KS Radhakrishnan and Justice Swatanter Kumar dismissed the petition observing that the court did not have jurisdiction to give direction on such matters.



“Under which provision of the constitution you are seeking the direction. We do not have the authority to give such a direction. There is clear separation of power,” the bench observed while dismissing the matter.



In last 64 Years no political party of India brought the law which will prohibit the criminals from contesting elections.



Criminals should be banned to contest any type of election then it may be public or private elections.



India is a very big country with big population.

We must remember that running country is a social service it is not business thus



India should adopt the policy once a criminal always a criminal no right to contest elections.

If that criminal becomes a good person he can do social service and he can guide people to vote a good candidate.



To do a social service and serve the country one does need to become the politician.



Reality views by sm –



Tags- News India Supreme Court Criminal Case MP Member of Parliament



READ MORE - Supreme Court dismisses PIL against criminal member of parliaments saying No Powers

Aug 11, 2011

List of 11 Websites Banned by Government of India Government Plans to monitor Twitter and Facebook

List of 11 Websites Banned by Government of India Government Plans to monitor Twitter and Facebook



Below is the list of 11 websites that are blocked by order of the Indian government.





1. http://www.zone-h.org



2. http://donotdial100.webs.com



3. http://www.bloggernews.net/124029



4. http://www.google.co.in/#h1=en&source=hp&biw=1276&bih=843&=dr+babasaheb+ambedkar+wallpaper&aq=4&aqi=g10&aql=&oq=dr+babas&gs_rfai=&fp=e791fe993fa412ba



5. http://www.cinemahd.net/desktop-enhancements/wallpaper/23945-wallpapers-beautiful-girl-wallpaper.html



6. http://www.chakpak.com/find/images/kamasutra-hindi-movie



7. http://www.submitlink.khatana.net/2010/09/jennifer-stano-is-engaged-to.html



8. http://www.result.khatana.net/2010/11/im-no-panty-girl-yana-gupta-wardrobe.html



9. http://www.facebook.com/pages/l-Hate-Ambedkar/172025102828076



10. http://www.indybay.org



11. http://arizona.indymedia.org



If you will visit above blocked sites you will not get message that the above site is blocked as per the orders of the government of India or by Department of Information Technology that is DIT.



Two of the blocked websites are grassroots news organizations connected to the Independent Media Centre: IndyBay (San Francisco Bay Area IMC) and the Arizona Indymedia website.



March 12,2010 – The bloggernews.net page that is one article is blocked.

N. Vijayashankar (Naavi) wrote a article titled as "Is E2 labs right in getting zone-h.org blocked?", criticizing the judicial blocking of Zone-H.org by E2 Labs.



CIS got the list of blocked sites from DIT.

CIS Filed a RTI and got this list from DIT.



All requests for websites blocking (except those directly from the judiciary) must be vetted by the Committee for Examination of Requests (CER) under Rule 8(4) of the Rules under s.69A of the IT Act.

Given that the DIT admits that the Designated Officer (who carries out the blocking) has received 21 requests to date, there should be at least 21 recommendations of the CER. However, the DIT has not provided CIS with the details of those 21 requests and the 21 recommendations. Now CIS is planning to file another RTI to uncover this information.



Now government of India has decided to monitor twitter and facebook sites 100%

That means each and everything including status updates or hidden messages will be monitored.



No Indian will be spared. So now on when you post anything on twitter or facebook think twice as government officers will be monitoring your conversation with your girl friend or wife or future wife or your business partner.



Some Facebook and Twitter content is already under the surveillance of the National Technical Research Organization.



Government of India has written to the department of telecom, asking it to "ensure effective monitoring of Twitter and Facebook".



What is the meaning of effective monitoring no one knows.



I feel that government of India should not monitor twitter or facebook or any site without the judicial orders.



If government or any organization has any problem with the content they should approach to the judiciary and should get such order from court.



It will be wastage of money to monitor in depth twitter and facebook sites.



Reality views by sm –



Tags – News Block Website List India DIT Facebook Twitter Monitor



READ MORE - List of 11 Websites Banned by Government of India Government Plans to monitor Twitter and Facebook

Jul 5, 2011

Supreme Court Restrains government from appointing tribal’s as special police officers, Salwa Judum" to counter fight against Maoists

The petition was filed in Court by sociologist Nandini Sundar, historian Ramachandra Guha, former bureaucrat E A S Sarma and others seeking a direction to the state government to refrain from allegedly supporting Salwa Judum.



The court order came in the wake of this petition filed by Nandini Sundar.

According to media reports even minors were appointed as SPO.

A Supreme Court bench comprising justices B Sudershan Reddy and S S Nijjar said that
The appointment of tribal youths as the special police officers SPOs is 'unconstitutional.

The special police officers have been given the name Koya Commandos after that of a tribe in the Dantewada region.

The bench ordered that Chhattisgarh government and the Centre should desist from appointing the tribal’s as Special Police Officers (SPOs) and arming them for countering the Naxals in any manner directly or indirectly.

The court directed the Chhattisgarh government to recover all the firearms given to SPOs along with the ammunition. It directed the central government to ensure that its finances are not used for funding such illegal activities.

State government had appointed more than 4500 tribal youths as Special police officers taken from "Salwa Judum" or "Peace March" movement started by the State government in 2005.

The court had also questioned the training programme of the SPOs.

State government paid them only monthly salary of Rs.1500 that is monthly salary of only $ 30 to $35 American dollars.

During the hearing Court said that "You are playing with the so called SPOs. What will happen if they turn against the state? God save this country,"

Swami Agnivesh was attacked by a group of people - allegedly consisting of SPOs and Salwa Judum volunteers - when he was visiting a Naxal region near Dantewada with activists of the Art of Living of Sri Sri Ravi Shankar.

The issue of attack on Swami Agnivesh was brought before the court in the month of April this year.

Bench ordered a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into an attack on social activist Swami Agnivesh in a tribal area of the state March 23, 2011.


Reality views by sm –

Tags – News Supreme Court Salwa judum, unconstitutional, Koya Commando

READ MORE - Supreme Court Restrains government from appointing tribal’s as special police officers, Salwa Judum" to counter fight against Maoists

Jun 30, 2011

Chinese Telecom Company Huawei will check all telecom equipments for spyware in India for the India MOU signed between Huawei and IISC Bangalore

Chinese Telecom Company Huawei will check all telecom equipments
for spyware in India for the India MOU signed between
Huawei and IISC Bangalore

Huawei Technologies is a Chinese company based in Shenzhen
Ren Zhengfei, a former soldier who worked for 10 years in China’s Army Engineering Corps, founded Huawei as a reseller of telecommunications equipment in 1988.
Huawei is the largest networking and telecommunications equipment supplier in China


Huawei has 17 research centers around the world, including in Dallas, Moscow and Bangalore, India, and most recently in Santa Clara.
In May, Huawei opened a stunning $340 million research center in Shanghai

Huawei is now the world’s second-largest telecom equipment supplier behind Ericsson of Sweden, and with Chinese government backing, it has sewn up major deals in Asia, Africa and Latin America.
In Europe, Huawei has outmaneuvered Ericsson to supply equipment to big carriers.

In 2008 Huawei tried to buy 3COM, Motorola and 2wire but both attempts failed.
Media has reported that American government will never allow those deals thus both attempts failed.

Even Many American politicians are afraid of Huawei because of security reasons.
In past Huawei has supplied communications equipment to Iran and Iraq during Saddam Hussein’s regime, possibly in violation of United Nations sanctions.

Now this shows that Huawei is very powerful telecom company and to control them is very difficult.

Media has reported that Huawei receives subsidies from Chinese government.

In 1999 Huawei set up its Research and development centre in Bangalore.

In 2005, India had blocked Huawei from supplying equipment to India's national network, BSNL.

in 2010 the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had insisted on canceling the rest of the Huawei contract with BSNL and questioned the dubious links of several top BSNL officers with Chinese firms.

Furthermore security agencies found that part of Huawei's Bangalore R&D office building was off limits to Indians.

Earlier, the Indian government had banned telecom equipment from Chinese manufacturers like Huawei suspecting spy software embedded in the gadgets.

Currently 80% telecom equipment in India is imported.
the Department of Telecommunications has decided to develop a safety certification regime for all imported equipments because of security reasons as malware and spyware may come with them thus enabling the enemy or people or group or countries who think bad about India to disturb Indian telecom sector or tap the phone etc.

Currently No Indian company in India is capable to do this Job if its capable they should declare it that way.
Still you think India is going to become Super Power?

Now Indian Government has decided that selected Chinese company Huawei
to help India find out spy software hidden in imported telecom equipments.

the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) and the home ministry have sanctioned a project to develop a safety certification regime for all imported telecommunications equipments and an agreement has been signed by the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) and China’s Huawei Technologies.
On June 15 IISC and Huawei signed MOU.
MOU signed between the two is more like a NON-DISCLOSURE-AGREEMENT so that the information that IISc gets from Huawei is not disclosed to others.
"A Chinese firm being allowed to tie up with the Bangalore-based Indian Institute of Science (IISc) for testing imported telecom gear shows that India has no foreign policy.

China's Huawei Technologies will work with the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) to test all imported mobile handsets and equipment for built-in malicious software.
The company will become the entry point for all the imported telecom equipments.
The company will provide "documentation, expertise, methods and standards for studying telecom equipment".
The company will assist Indian agencies in scrutinizing their equipment by providing data starting from manuals and extending to source codes.

To test all the telecom hardware manufactured world over the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore will set up a lab at an estimated cost of Rs. 60 Crore (Rs. 600 million) of which Rs. 50 Crore (Rs. 500 million) would be funded by the government.

Let us hope that Indian government has taken full precautions while signing MOU with Chinese company Huawei will not allow backdoor entry to Chinese government.

Why No Indian company is capable to do this job?

Reality views by sm-
Thursday, June 30, 2011

Keyword Tag – China MOU IISC Bangalore Huawei Telecom Equipment Spyware Malware Testing LAB

READ MORE - Chinese Telecom Company Huawei will check all telecom equipments for spyware in India for the India MOU signed between Huawei and IISC Bangalore

Jun 29, 2011

Know about CAG - Comptroller and Auditor-General's (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971

Know about CAG - Comptroller and Auditor-General's
(Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971

An Act to determine the conditions of service of the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India and to prescribe his duties and powers and for that matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.

CHAPTER 1

PRELIMINARY

1. Short title
This Act may be called the Comptroller and Auditor-General’s (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971.


2. Definitions
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,
(a) "Accounts", in relation to commercial undertakings of a Government, includes trading, manufacturing and profit and loss
Accounts and balance-sheets and other subsidiary accounts;

(b) "Appropriation accounts" means accounts which relate the expenditure brought to account during a financial year, to the several items specified in the law made in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution or of the Government of
Union Territories Act, 1963, (20 of 1963) for the appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of India or of a State, or of a Union territory having a Legislative Assembly, as the case may be;

(c) "Comptroller and Auditor-General" means the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India appointed under article 148 of the Constitution;

(d) "State" means a State specified in the First Schedule to the Constitution;

(e) "Union" includes a Union territory, whether having a Legislative Assembly or not.

CHAPTER II

SALARY AND OTHER CONDITIONS OF SERVICE OF
THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR-GENERAL
Salary

3. There shall be paid to the Comptroller and Auditor-General a salary which is equal to the salary of the Judge of the Supreme Court:

Provided that if a person who, immediately before the date of assuming office as the Comptroller and Auditor-General, was in receipt of, or, being eligible so to do, had elected to draw, a pension (other than a disability or wound pension) in respect of any previous service under the Government of the Union or any of its predecessor
Governments, or under the Government of a State or any of its predecessor Governments, his salary in respect of service as Comptroller and Auditor-General shall be reduced:

(a) By the amount of that pension; and

(b) If he had, before assuming office, received, in lieu of a portion of the pension due to him in respect of such previous service, the commuted value thereof, by the amount of that portion of the pension.

Term of Office

4. The Comptroller and Auditor-General shall hold office for a term of six years from the date on which he assumes such office:

Provided that where he attains the age of sixty-five years before the expiry of the said term of six years, he shall vacate such office on the date on which he attains the said age.
Provided further that he may, at any time, by writing under his hand addressed to the President, resign his office.

Explanation: For the purpose of this section, the term of six years in respect of the Comptroller and Auditor-General holding office immediately before the commencement of this Act, shall be computed from the date on which he had assumed office.
Leave

5. (1) A person who, immediately before the date of assuming office as the Comptroller and Auditor-General, was in the service of Government may be granted during his tenure of office but not thereafter, leave in accordance with the rules for the time being applicable to the Service to which he belonged before such date and he shall be entitled to carry forward the amount of leave standing at his credit on such date, notwithstanding anything contained in section 6.

(2) Any other person who is appointed as the Comptroller and Auditor-General may be granted leave in accordance with such rules as are for the time being applicable to a member of the Indian Administrative Service.

(3) The power to grant or refuse leave to the Comptroller and Auditor-General and to revoke or curtail leave granted to
him, shall vest in the President.

Pension

6. (1) A person who, immediately before the date of assuming office as the Comptroller and Auditor-General, was in the
service of Government shall be deemed to have retired from service on the date on which he enters upon office as the Comptroller and Auditor-General but his service as Comptroller and Auditor-General shall be reckoned as continuing approved service counting for pension in the Service to which he belonged.

(2) Every person who enters upon office as the Comptroller and Auditor-General shall, on demitting the said office, be eligible to a pension of a sum of fifteen thousand rupees per annum which sum shall include: the aggregate of all pensions payable to him and the commuted portion, if any, of his pension, and the pension equivalent of the retirement gratuity, if any, which may have been admissible to him under the rules for the time being applicable to the Service to which he belonged:

Provided that if such a person is or becomes eligible, at any time, under the rules for the time being governing the Service to which he belonged, to a pension higher than the said sum of fifteen thousand rupees, he shall be eligible to draw, as pension, the said higher amount.

(3) A person who, immediately before the date of assuming office as the Comptroller and Auditor-General, was in receipt of, or, had become eligible for receiving, a pension in respect of any previous service under Government, shall, on demitting office as the Comptroller and Auditor-General, be eligible to a pension of fifteen thousand rupees per annum which sum shall include the aggregate of all pensions payable to him and the commuted portion, if any, of his pension, and the pension equivalent of the retirement gratuity, if any, which may have been admissible to him under the rules for the time being applicable to the Service to which he belonged:

Provided that if such a person is or becomes eligible, at any time, under the rules for the time being governing the service to which he belonged, to a pension higher than the said sum of fifteen thousand rupees, on he shall be eligible to draw, as pension, the said higher amount.

(4) Any other person who is appointed as the Comptroller and Auditor-General shall, on demitting the said office, be eligible to a pension of fifteen thousand rupees per annum.

(5) The person holding office immediately before the commencement of this Act as the Comptroller and Auditor-General shall be eligible to draw, at his option, pension at the rate at which it would be admissible to him if this Act had not come into force or at the rate specified in this section.

(6) A person who demits office as the Comptroller and Auditor-General by resignation shall, on such demission, be eligible to a pension at the rate of two thousand rupees per annum for each completed year of his service as the Comptroller and Auditor General:
Provided that in the case of a person referred to in sub-section (1) or sub-section (3), the aggregate amount of pension admissible under this sub-section together with the amount of pension including the commuted portion, if any, of his pension, and the pension equivalent of the retirement gratuity if any which may have been admissible to him under the rules for the time being applicable to the Service to which he belonged
immediately before he assumed office as the Comptroller and Auditor-General, shall not exceed fifteen thousand rupees per annum or the higher pension referred to in proviso to sub-section (2) or sub-section (3), as the case may be.

(6A) Notwithstanding, anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this section a person referred to in sub-section (1) who demits office (whether in any manner specified in sub-section (8) or by resignation) as the Comptroller and Auditor-General after the commencement of the Comptroller and Auditor-General's (Duties, Powers and conditions of Service)

Amendment Act, 1984, shall, on such demission, be entitled to: -
(a) the pension to which he would have been entitled under the rules of the Service to which he belonged by reckoning his service as the Comptroller and Auditor-General as continuing approved service counting for pension in such Service; and

(b) a special pension of seven hundred rupees per annum in respect of each completed year of service as the Comptroller and Auditor-General;

(6B) Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this section, a person referred to in sub-section (3)who demits office (whether in any manner specified in sub-section (8) or by resignation) as the Comptroller and Auditor-General after the commencement of the Comptroller and Auditor-General's (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Amendment Act, 1984, shall, on such demission be entitled to:

(a) the pension payable to him in respect of any previous service under Government; and

(b) a special pension of seven hundred rupees per annum in respect of each completed year of service as the Comptroller and Auditor-General.

(6C) Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this section, a person who demits office (whether in any manner specified in sub-section 8 (or by resignation) as the Comptroller and Auditor-General after the commencement
of the Comptroller and Auditor-General's (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Amendment Act, 1987 shall, on such-demission, be entitled to-

(a) a pension which is equal to the pension payable to a Judge of the Supreme Court,-

(i) if such person is a person referred to in sub-section (1) or sub-section (3), in accordance with the provisions of part III of the Schedule to the Supreme Court Judges (Conditions of Services) Act, 1958 (41 of 1958) (hereafter in this Act referred to as the Supreme Court Judges Act), as amended from t time to time.

(ii) If such person is a person referred to in subsection (4), in accordance with the provisions of Part I of the Schedule to the Supreme Court Judges Act, as amended from time to time.

(b) Such pension (including commutation of pension), family pension and gratuity as are admissible to a Judge of Supreme Court under the Supreme Court Judges Act and the rules made thereunder, as amended from time to time.

(6D) Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this section, a person who demitted office (whether in any manner specified in sub section (8) or by resignation) as the Comptroller and Auditor-General, at any time before the 16th day of December, 1987, shall be entitled to the pension specified in sub section (6C) on and from that date.

(7) If a person who demits office as the Comptroller and Auditor-General is not eligible to any pension under this section but is eligible to a pension under the rules for the time being applicable to the Service to which he belonged immediately before he assumed office as the Comptroller and Auditor-General he shall, notwithstanding anything contained in this section, be eligible to draw such pension as is admissible to him under the said rules.

(8) Except where he demits office by resignation, a person holding office of the Comptroller and Auditor-General shall be deemed, for the purposes of this Act, to have demitted such office as such if, and only if-

(a) he has completed the term of office specified in section 4, or

(b) he has attained the age of sixty-five years, or

(c) his demission of office is medically certified to be necessitated by ill-health.

7. Omitted.

Right to Subscribe to General Provident Fund

8. Every person holding office as the Comptroller and Auditor-General shall be entitled to subscribe to the General Provident Fund (Central Services).

Other Conditions of Service

9. Save as otherwise provided in this Act, the conditions of service relating to travelling allowance, provision of rent free residence and exemption from payment of income-tax on the value of such rent-free residence, conveyance facilities, sumptuary allowance, medical facilities and such other conditions of service as are for the time being applicable to a Judge of the Supreme Court under Chapter IV of the Supreme Court Judges Act, and the rules are made thereunder, shall, so far as may be, apply to a serving or retired Comptroller and Auditor-General as the case may be.
Provided that nothing in this section shall have effect so as to give a person, who immediately before the date of assuming office as the Comptroller and Auditor-General, was in the service of Govt. less favorable terms in respect of any of the matters aforesaid than those to which he would be entitled as a member of the Service
to which he belonged, his service as Comptroller and Auditor-General being treated for the purpose of this proviso as continuing service in the Service to which he belonged.

CHAPTER III

DUTIES AND POWERS OF THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR-GENERAL
Comptroller and Auditor-General to compile accounts of Union and States

10. (1) The Comptroller and Auditor-General shall be responsible-

(a) for compiling the accounts of the Union and of each State from the initial and subsidiary account rendered to the audit and accounts offices under his control by treasuries, offices or departments responsible for the keeping of such accounts;
And

(b) for keeping such accounts in relation to any of the matters specified in clause (a) as may be necessary:

Provided that the President may, after consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor-General, by order relieve him from the responsibility for compiling-

(i) the said accounts of the Union (either at once or gradually by the issue of several orders); or

(ii) the accounts of any particular services or departments of the Union:
Provided further that the Governor of a State may with the previous approval of the President and after consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor-General, by order, relieve him from the responsibility for compiling-

(i) the said accounts of the State (either at once or gradually by the issue of several orders); or

(ii) the accounts of any particular services or departments of the State:
Provided also that the President may, after consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor-General, by order, relieve him from the responsibility for keeping the accounts of any particular class or character.

(2) Where, under any arrangement, a person other than the Comptroller and Auditor-General has, before the commencement of this Act, been responsible-

(i) for compiling the accounts of any particular service or department of the Union or of a State, or

(ii) for keeping the accounts of any particular class or character,

such arrangement shall, notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), continue to be in force unless, after consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor-General, it is revoked in the case referred to in clause (i),by an order of the President or the Governor of the State, as the case may be, and in the case referred to in clause (ii) by an order of the President.
Comptroller and Auditor-General to prepare and submit accounts to the President, Governors of States and Administrators of Union Territories having Legislative Assemblies

11. The Comptroller and Auditor-General shall from the accounts compiled by him or by the Government or any other person responsible in that behalf prepare in each year accounts (including, in the case of accounts compiled by him, appropriation accounts) showing under the respective heads the annual receipts and disbursements for the purpose of the Union, of each State and of each Union territory having a Legislative Assembly, and shall submit those accounts to the President or the Governor of a State or Administrator of the Union territory having a Legislative Assembly, as the case may be on or before such dates as he may, with the concurrence of the Government concerned, determine:

Provided that the President may, after consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor-General, by order, relieve him from the responsibility for the preparation and submission of the accounts relating to annual receipts and disbursements for the purpose of the Union or of a Union territory having a Legislative Assembly;

Provided further that the Governor of a State may, with the previous approval of the President and after consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor-General, by order, relieve him from the responsibility for the preparation and submission of the accounts relating to annual receipts and disbursements for the purpose of the State. Comptroller and Auditor-General to give information and render assistance to the Union and States

12. The Comptroller and Auditor-General shall, in so far as the accounts, for the compilation or keeping of which he is responsible, enable him so to do, give to the Union government, to the State Governments or to the Governments of Union Territories having Legislative Assemblies, as the case may be, such information as they may, from t time to time, require, and render such assistance in the preparation of their annual financial statements as they may reasonably ask for.

General Provisions Relating to Audit

13. It shall be the duty of the Comptroller and Auditor-General-
(a) to audit all expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India and of each State and of each Union territory having a Legislative Assembly and to ascertain whether the moneys shown in the accounts as having been disbursed were legally available for and applicable to the service or purpose to which they have been applied or charged and whether the expenditure conforms to the authority which governs it;

(b) to audit all transactions of the Union and of the States relating to Contingency Funds and Public Accounts;

(c) to audit all trading, manufacturing, profit and loss accounts and balance-sheets and other subsidiary accounts kept in any department of the Union or of a State; and in each case to report on the expenditure, transactions or accounts so audited by him.

Audit of receipts and expenditure of bodies or authorities substantially financed from Union or State Revenues

14.(1) Where any body or authority is substantially financed by grants or loans from the Consolidated Fund of India or of any State or of any Union territory having a Legislative Assembly, the Comptroller and Auditor-General shall, subject to the provisions of any law for the time being in, force applicable to the body or authority, as the case may be, audit all receipts and expenditure of that body or authority and to report on the receipts and expenditure audited by him.

Explanation: Where the grant or loan to a body or authority from the Consolidated Fund of India or of any State or of any Union territory having a Legislative Assembly in a financial year is not less than rupees twenty-five lakhs and the amount of such grant or loan is not less than seventy-five percent of the total expenditure of that body or authority, such body or authority shall be, deemed, for the purposes of this sub-section, to be substantially financed by such grants or loans as the case may be.

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) the Comptroller and Auditor-General may with the previous approval of the President or the Governor of a State or the Administrator of a Union territory having a Legislative Assembly, as the case may be, audit all receipts and expenditure of any body or authority where the grants or loans to such body or authority from the Consolidated Fund of India or of any State or of any Union territory having a Legislative Assembly, as the case may be in a financial year is not less than rupees one Crore.

(3) Where the receipts and expenditure of any body or authority are by virtue of the fulfillment of the, conditions specified in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) audited by the Comptroller and Auditor-General in a financial year

Functions of Comptroller and Auditor-General in the Case of Grants or Loans given to other Authorities or Bodies

15. (1) Where any grant or loan is given for any specific purpose from the Consolidated Fund of India or of any State or of any Union territory having a Legislative Assembly to any authority or body, not being a foreign State or international organization, the Comptroller and Auditor-General shall scrutinize the procedures by which the sanctioning authority satisfies itself as to the fulfillment of the conditions subject to which such grants or loans were given and shall for this purpose have right of access, after giving reasonable previous notice, to the books and accounts of that authority or body:

Provided that the President, the Governor of a State or the Administrator of a Union territory having a Legislative Assembly, as the case may be, may, where he is of opinion that it is necessary so to do in the public interest , by order, relieve the Comptroller and Auditor-General, after consultation with him, from making any such scrutiny in respect of any body or authority receiving such grant or loan.

(2) Except where he is authorized so to do by the President, the Governor of a State or the Administrator of Union territory having a Legislative Assembly, as the case may be, the Comptroller and Auditor-General shall not have, while exercising the powers conferred on him by sub-section (1), right of access to the books and accounts of any corporation to which any such grant or loan as is referred to in subsection (1) is given if the law by or under which such corporation has been established provides for the audit of the accounts of such corporation by an agency other than the Comptroller and Auditor-General:
Provided that no such authorization shall be made except after consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor- General and except after giving the concerned corporation a reasonable opportunity of making representations with regard to the proposal to give to the Comptroller and Auditor-General right of access to its books and accounts.

Audit of Receipts of Union or of States

16. It shall be the duty of the Comptroller and Auditor-General to audit all receipts which are payable into the Consolidated Fund of India and of each State and of each Union territory having a Legislative Assembly and to satisfy himself that the rules and procedures in that behalf are designed to secure an effective check on the assessment, collection and proper allocation of revenue and are being duly observed and to make for this purpose such examination of the accounts as he thinks fit and report thereon.
Audit of accounts of stores and stock

17. The Comptroller and Auditor-General shall have authority to audit and report on the accounts of stores and stock kept in any office or department of the Union or of a State.

Powers of Comptroller and Auditor-General in connection with audit of accounts

18. (1) The Comptroller and Auditor-General shall in connection with the performance of his duties under this Act, have authority-

(a) to inspect any office of accounts under the control of the union or of a State, including treasuries, and such offices responsible for the keeping of initial or subsidiary accounts, as submit accounts to him;

(b) to require that any accounts, books, papers and other documents which deal with or form the basis of or an otherwise relevant to the transactions to which his duties in respect of audit extend, shall be sent to such place as he may appoint for his inspection;

(c) to put such quest ions or make such observations as he may consider necessary, to the person in charge of the office and to call for such information as he may require for the preparation of any account or report which it is his duty to prepare.

(2) The person in charge of any office or department, the accounts of which have to be inspected and audited by the Comptroller and Auditor-General, shall afford all facilities for such inspection and comply with requests for information in as complete a form as possible and with all reasonable expedition.

Audit of Government companies and corporations

19. (1) The duties and powers of the Comptroller and Auditor-General in relation to the audit of the accounts of Government companies shall be performed and exercised by him in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956).

(2) The duties and powers of the Comptroller and Auditor-General in relation to the audit of the accounts of corporations (not being companies) established by or under law made by Parliament shall be performed and exercised by him in accordance with the provisions of the respective legislations.

(3) The Governor of a State or the Administrator of a Union territory having a Legislative Assembly may, where he is of opinion that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, request the Comptroller and Auditor-General to audit the accounts of a corporation established by law made by the Legislature of the State or of the Union territory, as the case may be, and where such request has been made, the Comptroller and Auditor-General shall audit the accounts of such corporation and shall have, for the purposes of such audit, right of access to the books and accounts of such corporation:

Provided that no such request shall be made except after consultation with the Comptroller, and Auditor-General and except after giving reasonable opportunity to the corporation to make representations with regard to the proposal for such audit.

Laying of reports in relation to accounts of Government companies and corporation

19A. (1) The reports of the Comptroller and Auditor-General, in relation to audit of accounts of a Government company or a corporation referred to in section 19, shall be submitted to the Government or Governments concerned.

(2) The Central Government shall cause every report received by it under sub-section (1) to be laid, as soon as may be after it is received, before each House of Parliament

(3) The State Government shall cause every report received by it under sub-section (1) to be laid, as soon as may be after it is received, before the Legislature of the State.

Explanation : For the purposes of this section "Government or "State Government" in relation to a Union Territory having a Legislative Assembly, means the Administrator of the Union territory.

Audit of accounts of certain authorities or bodies

20. (1) Save as otherwise provided in section 19, where the audit of the accounts of any body or authority has not been entrusted to the Comptroller and Auditor-General by or under any law made by Parliament, he shall, if requested so to do by the President, or the Governor of a State or the Administrator of a Union territory having a Legislative Assembly, as the case may be, undertake the audit of the accounts of such body or authority on such terms and conditions as may be agreed upon between him and the concerned Government and shall have, for the purposes of such audit, right of access to
the books and accounts of that body or authority:

Provided that no such request shall be made except after consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor-General.

(2) The Comptroller and Auditor-General may propose to the President or the Governor of a State or the Administrator of a Union territory having a Legislative Assembly, as the case may be, that he may authorized to undertake the audit of accounts of any body or authority, the audit of the account of which has not been entrusted to him by law, if he is of opinion that such audit is necessary because a substantial amount has been invested in, or advanced to, such body or authority by the Central or State Government or by the Government of a Union territory having a Legislative Assembly, and on such request being made, the President or the Governor or, the Administrator, as the case may be, may empower the Comptroller and Auditor-General to undertake the audit of the accounts of such body or authority.

(3) The audit referred to in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall not be entrusted to the Comptroller and Auditor-General except where the President or the Governor of a State or the Administrator of a Union territory having a Legislative Assembly, as the case may be, is satisfied that it is expedient so to do in the public-interest and except after giving a
reasonable opportunity to the concerned body or authority to make representations with regard to the proposal for such audit

CHAPTER IV

MISCELLANEOUS

Delegation of Power of Comptroller and Auditor-General

21. Any power exercisable by the Comptroller and Auditor-General under the provisions of this Act, or any other law may be exercised by such officer of his department as may be authorized by him in this behalf by general or special order.

Provided that except during the absence of the Comptroller and Auditor-General on leave or otherwise, no officer shall be authorized to submit on behalf of the Comptroller and Auditor-General any report which the Comptroller and Auditor-General is required by the Constitution or the Government of Union Territories Act,1963 (20 of 1963) to submit to the President or the Governor of a State or the Administrator of a Union territory having a Legislative Assembly, as the case may be.

Power to Make Rules

22. (1) The Central Government may, after consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor-General, by notification in the official Gazette, make rules for carrying out the provisions of this Act in so far as they relate to the maintenance of accounts.

(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:-

(a) the manner in which initial and subsidiary accounts shall be kept by the treasuries, offices and departments rendering accounts to audit and accounts offices;

(b) the manner in which the accounts of the Union or of a State or of any particular service or department or of any particular class or character, in respect of which the Comptroller and Auditor-General has been relieved from the responsibility of compiling or keeping the accounts, shall be compiled or kept;

(c) the manner in which the accounts of stores and stock shall be kept in any office or department of the Union or of a State, as the case may be;

(d) any other matter which is required to be. or may be, prescribed by rules

(3) Every rule made under this section shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before each House of Parliament, while it is in session, for a total period of thirty day's which may be comprised in one Session or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or both Houses agree that the rules should not be made, the rule shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so, however, that any such
modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule.

Power to make regulations

23. The Comptroller and Auditor-General is hereby authorized to make regulations for carrying into effect the provisions of this Act in so far as they related to the scope and extent of audit, including laying down for the guidance of the Government Departments the general principles of Government accounting and the broad principles in regard to audit of receipts and expenditure.
Power to dispense with detailed audit

24. The Comptroller and Auditor-General is hereby authorized to dispense with, when circumstances so warrant, any part of detailed audit of any accounts or class of transactions and to apply such limited check in relation to such accounts or
transactions as he may determine.

Repeal
25. The Comptroller and Auditor-General (Conditions of Service) Act 1953,(21 of 1953) is hereby repealed.

Removal of doubts

26. For removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that on the commencement of this Act the Government of India (Audit and Accounts) Order, 1936, as adapted by the India (Provisional Constitution) Order, 1947, shall cease to be in force except as respects anything done or any action taken thereunder.

Reality views by sm –
Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Tag – CAG Power Function Duties

READ MORE - Know about CAG - Comptroller and Auditor-General's (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971

Jun 24, 2011

PIL Madras High Court issues notices to the Centre and CBI for taking the CBI out of the ambit of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

PIL Madras High Court issues notices to the Centre and CBI for
taking the CBI out of the ambit of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

Government of India, Centre through a notification issued on June 9, had placed the agency in the organizations listed in the second schedule of Section 24 of the RTI Act.
Union Government said that CBI needs protection as information is sensitive and can damage the investigations done by them or national security may get compromised.


A PIL was filed in the high court challenging the Centre's decision. The petitioner argued that it was not necessary to give a "blanket protection" to the CBI from revealing information.

The Madras High Court on Friday issued notices to the Centre and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for taking the investigating agency out of the ambit of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

The notices have to be responded by both the Centre and the CBI within three weeks.

RTI act has already given the protection to sensitive information.
Thus CBI do not need the protection, it is the right of every citizen of India to know who is criminal and how the CBI is performing its duty.

Suggested Reading –

CBI is not under RTI act Government Supports CBI and both protect each other

http://realityviews.blogspot.com/2011/06/cbi-is-not-under-rti-act-government.html

Reality views by sm-
Friday, June 24, 2011

Keyword Tag – PIL Madras High Court CBI Centre Exemption Notice

READ MORE - PIL Madras High Court issues notices to the Centre and CBI for taking the CBI out of the ambit of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

IIPM MBA Students File Petition in High Court against IIPM demanding refunds of fees and close or derecognize IIPM and prosecute them

IIPM MBA Students File Petition in High Court against IIPM
demanding refunds of fees and close or derecognize IIPM and prosecute them

A batch of students from Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM) filed a petition in Karnataka High court seeking refund of fees paid by them for pursuing an MBA course at the institute.
The students of IIPM also sought a direction to the authorities to take appropriate steps to close or derecognize IIPM and prosecute them under relevant provisions of law.


while hearing the petition Justice S Abdul Nazir verified the institute's prospectus and saw the photos of Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan in the Prospectus after looking them
the Honorable Judges ask to the lawyer representing IIPM that "What has Shah Rukh Khan got to do with your institution? Does he have any contract as your brand
ambassador? Or he is an old student? What is the connection? Can celebrities like him promote an educational institution as they promote a product?"

The judge also indicated that in case there is no satisfactory response from IIPM with regard to the queries posed by the court, notice may be ordered to SRK requiring him to appear and reply .

The petitioners who were admitted for a two-y ear full-time MBA degree in planning and
entrepreneurship in 2010-1 1 have complained that inspite of their repeated enquiries, neither the IIPM had not disclosed any information pertaining to its registration, recognition, affiliation nor any provision of law under which the institute has been established or functioning.
They also claimed that the MS University , Tamil Nadu which had certified IIPM as an approved onsite academic partner is a private University and cannot operate outside Tamil Nadu and doesn't possess approval for conducting distance education courses.

Further the Petitioners informed to the Court that When the classes commenced in a godown in electronics city , the devastated students questioned the staff about the genuineness of the course. To this the staff members revealed that IIPM was neither
registered nor affiliated by any statutory authorities as required under law,"

"As per the prospectus, the IIPM is offering three categories of courses depending upon fee structure, highest being Rs 11 lakh and the minimum being Rs 4.7 lakh.

The court has posted the matter to July 4 on the petition filed by Praveen V Mesta and others.
The Karnataka high court has issued notice to Bangalore University and the Visvesvaray a Technological University , Belgaum, with regards to a petition filed by students.

Arindam Choudhary is the founder-director of IIPM.

Suggested Reading –

The Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM) has filed Rs 50 crore defamation suit against Caravan magazine, Delhi Press, author Siddhartha Deb, Penguin Books and Google

http://realityviews.blogspot.com/2011/06/iipm-has-filed-rs-50-crore-defamation.html

Reality views by sm-
Friday, June 24, 2011

Keyword Tag – IIPM Arindam Choudhary Karnataka High Court SRK Notice Tamil Nadu

Source – TNN

READ MORE - IIPM MBA Students File Petition in High Court against IIPM demanding refunds of fees and close or derecognize IIPM and prosecute them

IIPM has filed Rs 50 crore defamation suit against Caravan magazine, Delhi Press, author Siddhartha Deb, Penguin Books and Google

The Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM) has filed Rs 50 crore defamation suit against Caravan magazine, Delhi Press, author Siddhartha Deb, Penguin Books and Google



February 2011 –

The Carvan magazine published a cover story which focussed on the Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM) director Arindam Chaudhuri.



The article, titled “Sweet Smell of Success: How Arindam Chaudhuri Made a Fortune off the Aspirations and Insecurities of India’s Middle Classes”, was written by Siddhartha Deb and article is a one of the chapter from an upcoming book by Siddhartha Deb to be published by Penguin.





This article discusses takes a critical look at director Arindam Chaudhuri, his image and the business practices of the IIPM.



The article in question has been removed from The Caravan’s website, following a preliminary ex-parte injunction granted by the civil court in Silchar.

After Court order the article has been pulled from publication.

Siddhartha Deb is a contributing editor at The Caravan and a university professor based in New York.



The Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM) has filed Rs 50 crore defamation suit against The Caravan magazine, its proprietors Delhi Press, author Siddhartha Deb, the publishing house Penguin Books India, and Google India.



The lawsuit accuses The Caravan and others of “grave harassment and injury,” while charging Google of “publishing, distributing, giving coverage, circulating, blogging the defamatory, libelous and slanderous articles.”



The suit is filed in the Court of Civil Judge in Silchar, Assam.

The first plaintiff is Kishorendu Gupta, who operates Gupta Electrical Engineers in Silchar and IIPM is second Plaintiff.



Magazine is published in Delhi but law suit is filed in Assam.

IIPM and the magazine’s publisher, Delhi Press, are based 2,200 km away



Caravan has issued a lengthy press release citing IIPM’s history of suing various media publications in order to silence critical coverage.



Carvan Press Release



Kishorendu Gupta is a commissioned agent who works for the IIPM on a contractual basis. Although Gupta is called a counselor, a contract between Gupta and IIPM shows Gupta is a recruitment agent who has commercial interest and is Paid for his service on a commission basis. IIPM’s contract with Gupta states:



“for number of students enrolled between 1 to 24, the compensation would be Rs.75,000 per student …[and] for anyone who crosses the 25 students mark, the compensation would be Rs.90,000 per student…[and] for anyone who crosses the 50 student mark,

The compensation would be Rs.1, 25,000 per student” (From the agreement submitted by the plaintiffs in the court).



The Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM), whose director, Arindam Chaudhuri, was the subject of the cover story of our February 2011 issue, has filed a lawsuit against The Caravan, citing “grave harassment and injury”.



The article, titled “Sweet Smell of Success: How Arindam Chaudhuri Made a Fortune Off the Aspirations—and Insecurities—of India’s Middle Classes”, was written by Siddhartha Deb, a contributing editor at The Caravan and an accomplished writer and university professor based in New York. Deb’s profile of Arindam Chaudhuri, which shows how Chaudhuri built an image for himself and how he runs his educational institution, has been critically praised for both its thorough reporting and its spirit of evenhandedness.



In the weeks that followed its initial publication, in print and on The Caravan’s website, the extensive article was widely referenced, commented on, and shared by readers.



The suit against The Caravan, which seeks huge damages, has been filed not in Delhi, where both the IIPM and the magazine’s publisher, Delhi Press, are based, but 2,200 km away in Silchar, Assam, 300 km from Guwahati, Assam’s capital.



The IIPM filed the case at the Court of Civil Judge in Silchar district, through one Kishorendu Gupta, who operates Gupta Electrical Engineers in a Silchar suburb, and is the first plain-tiff. IIPM is the second plaintiff.



In addition to The Caravan and its proprietors, the suit charges Siddhartha Deb, Penguin (the publisher of the upcoming book by Deb in which the article is a chapter), and Google India (which, the suit alleges, has been “publishing, distributing, giving coverage, circulating, blogging the defamatory, libelous and slanderous articles”).



The civil court in Silchar granted the IIPM a preliminary injunction, enjoining Delhi Press to remove the article in question from their website, ex-parte, without any pre-hearing notice.



Silchar courts, as the IIPM seems to be interested in dragging the matter out now that their purpose has been served by obtaining interim restraints.



The Caravan’s profile of Arindam Chaudhuri was the most thorough article published to date on the subject. The 10,000-word story was the result of several months of work

by Siddhartha Deb, whose exhaustive reporting included interviews with Arindam Chaudhuri himself and several of his close associates who spoke openly about the IIPM and its critics, coverage of Chaudhuri’s public functions, and an account of considerable time spent on the IIPM campus. The piece is distinguished by both its detailed research and its refined literary style.



The Caravan intends to fight this suit because we believe that we must defend the right of journalists to report on controversial subjects or persons without undue fear of legal

intimidation from powerful entities or organizations that seek to insulate themselves from criticism. Delhi Press, the publisher of The Caravan and many popular titles like Sarita,

Woman’s Era, Grihshobha and Mukta, has time and again been at the forefront of defending the right to freedom of speech and freedom of press during its 70 years of publishing history.



On account of the bold anti-authoritarian and anti-religious obscurantist articles published in its leading socio-political magazine in Hindi, Sarita, the group has successfully fought

all attempts of legal intimidation over the years.



If the IIPM can demonstrate that any errors of fact have been made, The Caravan will print a correction in the magazine as well as on its website. But the vast majority of the “falsehoods” cited in the legal suit are not based on matters of fact, and the objections merely reflect the discomfort of the IIPM with the language employed to describe the facts.



The Civil Court at Silchar, in its order granting the injunction against the magazine, has noted:” Defendants had written article making false imputations against IIPM Institute with false and concocted facts only to cause damage to the reputations, Goodwill, education activities of IIPM institute.



The said magazine carries and morphid image of Mr. Arindam Choudhury-Dean of the Centre for Economic Research and Advance studies of IIPM saying him as a magician/soothsayer in an attempt to portray him as a trickster and falsely stated that Mr. Arindam Choudhury has a reputation as a fraud, scamster and ‘Jhony come lately’ in order to malign and defame the dean of IIPM and create a negative public image of Mr. Arindam Choudhury”.



In their petition, the plaintiffs have raised an objection to the article’s statement that placements had always been a pressing problem for the IIPM graduates.



They have also raised an exception to the author’s claim, based on interviews with Arindam Chaudhuri himself, that almost 90 percent of Planman employees, including faculty members, have been former graduates of the IIPM.



The author had raised questions about the revenue and size of the company to Arindam Chaudhuri and his associates, but these went unanswered. The article states this, along with the



It is learnt that the IIPM has filed similar law-suits against certain other publishers, also in Silchar, Assam, rather than in Delhi. In 2005, the IIPM filed a case against Rashmi Bansal, a blogger and editor of Just Another Magazine (JAM), who pub-lished an article in print and online questioning many of the claims made by the IIPM in its brochures and advertisements, which highlighted that the IIPM had not been accredited by any Indian agency such as AICTE, UGC or under other state acts.



The IIPM filed a case against Bansal from Silchar, Assam, even though she runs a small independent outfit based in Mumbai. The IIPM managed to get an ex-parte order from the court, forcing Bansal to remove the article from the website. The IIPM also filed for damages.



In 2009, Careers360 magazine, published by Maheshwar Peri, who is also the publisher of Outlook magazine, carried an article titled “IIPM - Best only in claims?” investigating

The authenticity of many of the claims made by the IIPM in their advertisements.



The magazine’s investigation revealed that the IIPM claimed that its students were eligible for MBA degrees from IMI, Belgium, but that NVAO, the accreditation organization of Netherlands and Flanders (Belgium) did not recognize IMI.



Also it reported that following a local agitation against the opening of a new campus in Dehradun, the State government of Uttarakhand had asked the Uttarakhand Technical University to conduct an enquiry on the activities of the IIPM, with which IIPM did not co-operate. The investigations revealed that IIPM could not in any circumstances award valid MBA/BBA degrees or conduct such courses in the state of Uttarakhand.



The IIPM, again, filed a case against the magazine and the publisher in Silchar, and obtained ex-parte restraint against them.



The IIPM also filed a criminal case against Maheshwar Peri from Uttarakhand, which was subsequently quashed by the High Court. The cases against Rashmi Bansal and Careers360 are both still underway at the fact that while the IIPM spent over `300 million on advertising in 2006, it paid no income tax that year or the previous.



The sum and substance of the petition is that The Caravan has published a false, incorrect, defamatory and libelous article and has made false imputations against the IIPM, which, the petition says, the author and editors of The Caravan knew to be false, and that these were made with the intention to defame the IIPM institute as well as its councilors like Kishorendu Gupta.



While we reserve our right to respond to the allegations during the course of legal proceedings, it is interesting to note the following charges in particular:”



The magazine carries a morphed image of Mr. Arindam Chaudhari, Dean Centre for Economic Research and Advance Studies of IIPM, showing him as a magician/soothsayer in a manner which clearly is an attempt to portray him as a rickster.”



“The present campus at Satbari is also not in the city’s outskirts nor the road leading to it is dusty. Moreover, the works “proprietor”, “small”, “run of the mill”, “outskirts of elhi” and “the road is dusty” have been used by the Defendants with the aim to malign and defame the heads of IIPM as well as the IIPM institute.”As stated before, The Caravan as a respectable publication stands by what has been published, which is a true and accurate account of the IIPM as experienced by the author. But the suit that has been filed leads us to believe that the IIPM does not appear to have any desire to correct the record: instead

It aims to prevent any publication of material that paints the IIPM in a light it does not approve of.



The suit, in order to substantiate the charges, offers a long list of students, rent receipts from the Indian Tuberculosis Society, an agreement with Plaintiff No 1 Kishorendu Gupta, which runs into 25 clauses of commercial nature, and various Newspaper cuttings. Freedom of speech and expression is a fundamental right in this country, and various higher courts have consistently upheld this important fundamental right of individuals and publications.



The Caravan will continue to keep its readers updated with the proceedings in the court so that they know the truth about Both the veracity of the statements made in the article and the arguments of the IIPM and Kishorendu Gupta. For the benefit of the public, news of the court proceedings will be Published by Delhi Press in its 30 magazines in nine languages, which together have a readership of over 30 million people.



End of Press Release –







I have found that still the article is available on many blogs.

The article, titled “Sweet Smell of Success: How Arindam Chaudhuri Made a Fortune off the Aspirations and Insecurities of India’s Middle Classes”, was written by Siddhartha Deb.

You can read the article Sweet Smell of Success: How Arindam Chaudhuri Made a Fortune off the Aspirations and Insecurities of India’s Middle Classes”, was written by Siddhartha Deb here.

http://realarindamchaudhuri.blogspot.com/2011/06/sweet-smell-of-success-true-story-of.html



Updated - August 11 2011 the above article has been removed by the blog owner.



Reality views by sm-

Friday, June 24, 2011



Keyword Tag – IIPM defamation Suit 50 Crore Google Carvan Deb Author sweet smell



Source - www.caravanmagazine.in/IIPM_lawsuit.aspx



READ MORE - IIPM has filed Rs 50 crore defamation suit against Caravan magazine, Delhi Press, author Siddhartha Deb, Penguin Books and Google

Jun 15, 2011

Black Money Problem – Want to give your suggestions to government of India send mail to government your suggestions on black money

Black Money Problem – Want to give your suggestions to government of India
send mail to government your suggestions on black money

The government on Wednesday created an email id for public to send their ideas and inputs to tackle issues arising out of black money.


Below is the email id on which you can send your suggestions to government.

Email id - bm-feedback@nic.in

Citizens of India can sent their responses and inputs like imposing penalties and making penal provisions to tackle with the corruption issue.

Black Money and Demands –

1.
Punishment should be death punishment if found in a possession of black money.

2.
If no death punishment the demand is imprisonment of 1000 Years what ever may happen the person who founds with black money must stay in jail until his death.

3.
Declare black money as the national property.

4.
Offence of Black money should be made non bailable and the accused should be kept in jail until the final decision verdict of court. If accused moves to Higher courts that is files appeal then also he should be kept in Jail

5.
The law should presumed that the accused have collected black money by robbing the country. And only a week time should be given to accused to prove he got that money using good methods.

6.
Time limit should be fix for the Court regarding black money case. Each court must give judgment in a month of time. Trial Period must be fix. No next date should be allowed.


India has no law regarding this, your suggestions won’t be binding on government of India even if 100% citizens demand that bring the Prime Minister and Judiciary under Lokpal.

Will you write a mail in this connection to Government?

Do you feel afraid you will face the consequences if you write your suggestions to government of India?

Reality views by sm-
Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Tag Keyword - Black Money Suggestion Email ID

READ MORE - Black Money Problem – Want to give your suggestions to government of India send mail to government your suggestions on black money

Jun 2, 2011

Alcohol and Drinking Age in different countries and states Brief Comparison of Drinking age in different states

Alcohol and Drinking Age in different countries and
states Brief Comparison of Drinking age in different states

1-
Gujarat and Mizoram and drinking age
Gujarat and Mizoram both have prohibited legally it is not allowed to drink alcohol in both states. Alcohol is easily available in both states. Just have to pay more.



2- Maharashtra State and drinking age
Beer – Age 21
Minimum drinking age in the state is now 25 years for consumption of rum, whisky, vodka and country-made liquor.

3- Andhra Pradesh, Delhi, West Bengal and Tamil Nadu and drinking age
In Andhra Pradesh, Delhi, West Bengal and Tamil Nadu you can buy and drink alcohol at the age of 21.

4- Kerala, Goa, Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh and drinking age
Kerala, Goa, Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh one can start drinking alcohol at the age of 18

4. - china and Singapore and drinking age
In both china and Singapore one can start drinking alcohol at the age of 18

5- Japan –
In Japan minimum age to drink is 20 Years.

6-South Korea
In South Korea minimum age to drink alcohol is 19 Years.

7- Pakistan –
Only Non Muslims can drink after the age of 21.
In Islamic nations drinking is normally banned.

8-Argentina, Brazil, Cuba, Venezuela, Australia, Russia, Ukraine, Latvia, Lithuania, France, Czech Republic, Republic of Ireland, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia fix legal drinking age at 18.

9-In Austria, Belgium, Germany – legal age to drink 18

10-the Netherlands, and Switzerland, a purchaser of beer or wine must be 16 years of age, and 18 years for spirits.

11-In Italy and Portugal, 16 year olds can buy and drink or work in a place selling alcohol.

12-In the Scandinavian countries the legal drinking age is 18 years.
In Denmark, the legal age for buying alcoholic beverages containing 1.2 -16.5 per cent alcohol is 16 years in shops and 18 years in bars and restaurants

13-n the United Kingdom, the minimum age to purchase alcohol is 18 years in a bar and in private; the minimum age to consume alcohol is 5 years.

14- United states – Legal age to drink is 21 years as per National Minimum Drinking Age Act in 1984

Ban is not solution and one can vote at the age of 18 then should be allowed to drink at the age of 18.

Important is teaching the people benefits of not drinking and benefits of controlled drinking.

Ban the alcohol gives chance to do corruption to government officers.

Increase in age also gives chance and it increases the corruption done by the alcohol shop owners and government officers.

Government should never give subsidy to alcohol or wine making factories.

After all we got one life and one should have full right on his life

Reality views by sm –
Thursday, June 02, 2011

Keyword Tag - Drinking age Alcohol Age State Countries


READ MORE - Alcohol and Drinking Age in different countries and states Brief Comparison of Drinking age in different states

May 15, 2011

Know about the IPC sections 144, 151 under which Rahul Gandhi got arrested in Uttar Pradesh

Know about the IPC sections 144, 151 under which Rahul Gandhi
got arrested in Uttar Pradesh

After 19 Hours Uttar Pradesh Police arrested Rahul Gandhi in Bhatta Parsaul village in Uttar Pradesh's Greater Noida

Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860


Section 144 –
Joining unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapon –

Whoever, being armed with any deadly weapon, or with anything which, used as a weapon of offence, is likely to cause death, is a member of an unlawful assembly,
shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

Section 151-
Knowingly joining or continuing in assembly of five or more persons after it has been commanded to disperse –

Whoever knowingly joins or continues in any assembly of five or more persons likely to cause a disturbance of the public peace, after such assembly has been lawfully
commanded to disperse, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both.

Explanation-If the assembly is an unlawful assembly with the meaning of section 141, the offender will be punishable under section 145.

Section 141.
Unlawful assembly –

An assembly of five or more persons is designated an "unlawful assembly", if the common object of the persons composing that assembly is-

First-To overawe by criminal force, or show of criminal force, 1[the Central or any State Government of Parliament or the Legislature of any State], or any public servant
in the exercise of the lawful power of such public servant; or

Second-To resist the execution of any law, or of any legal process; or

Third-To commit any mischief or criminal trespass, or other offence; or

Fourth-By means of criminal force, or show of criminal force, to any person, to take or obtain possession of any property, or to deprive any person of the enjoyment of a
right of way, or of the use of water or other incorporeal right of which he is in possession or enjoyment, or to enforce any right or supposed right; or

Fifth-By means of criminal force, or show of criminal force, to compel any person to do what he is not legally bound to do, or to omit to do what he is legally entitled to
do.

Explanation-An assembly which was not unlawful when it assembled, may subsequently become an unlawful assembly.

Section 145.

Joining or continuing in unlawful assembly, knowing it has been commanded to disperse –
Whoever joins or continues in an unlawful assembly, knowing that such unlawful assembly has been commanded in the manner prescribed by law to disperse, shall be
punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

Suggested Reading –
Rahul Gandhi Arrested by UP Police in Bhatta Parsaul Village
http://realityviews.blogspot.com/2011/05/rahul-gandhi-arrested-by-up-police-in.html

Reality views by sm –
Sunday, May 15, 2011

Keyword Tag – Rahul Gandhi Congress Secretary Arrested Uttar Pradesh

READ MORE - Know about the IPC sections 144, 151 under which Rahul Gandhi got arrested in Uttar Pradesh

May 11, 2011

SC denies to change charge in Bhopal Case SC rejects CBI's curative petition seeking a stay on its 1996 judgment in the case

SC denies to change charge in Bhopal Case SC rejects CBI's
curative petition seeking a stay on its 1996 judgment in the case

In the early hours of December 3, 1984, around 40 metric tonnes of toxic methyl isocyanate (MIC) gas leaked into the atmosphere and was carried by the wind to the surrounding slums.

On June 7, 2010, a Bhopal court had sentenced seven former Carbide executives, including former Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) Chairman Keshub Mahindra, to two years in jail.


After this accused persons got bail.

After 14 years CBI filed a curative petition in this case seeking restoration of stringent charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder instead of death caused due to negligence against the accused in the world's worst industrial disaster that left over 15,000 people dead and thousands maimed.

In 1996, a two-judge bench of the Supreme court, headed by the then Chief Justice A H Ahmadi had diluted the charges against the accused from Section 304 Part II of the IPC providing for a maximum of ten years imprisonment to Section 304(A) that deals with rash and negligence act with a maximum punishment of two years.

Supreme Court on had on August 31 last decided to re-examine its own judgement that led to lighter punishment of two years imprisonment for all the convicts.

Supreme Court heard the case on day to day basis.

The Supreme Court Bench comprised of following judges who heard the case.
1. Chief Justice SH Kapadia
2. justice Altamas Kabir
3. Justice RV Raveendran
4. Justice B Sudershan Reddy
5. Justice Aftab Alam

Supreme Court bench has rejected the CBI's curative petition seeking a stay on its 1996 judgment in the case and restoration of stringent charges against the accused.

A five-judge special bench headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had raised the question on delay and asked the CBI as to why it had not filed the review petition during all these years.

Attorney General G E Vahanvati, appearing for the CBI, said: "I don’t know why it was not filed by the CBI."

SC said that it was not satisfied with the CBI and Madhya pradesh government's reasons for filing the curative petition after a lapse of 14 years or 16 years.

"No satisfactory explanation given by CBI and MP government on filing curative petition after lapse of 14 years," observed the Supreme Court

Now Supreme Court will hear the plea for enhancement of compensation from Rs 750 crore to Rs 7,700 crore for the victims.

PTI reported that A five-judge constitutional bench, headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia, however, left a window of opportunity open saying the pending proceedings before the sessions court against the Chief Judicial Magistrate's judgement awarding two years sentence to the accused, including Union Carbide India Chairman Keshub Mahindra will not be influenced by any order passed by it

Suggested Reading - Bhopal gas tragedy and investigation – Complete Report –
Bhopal Gas Disaster - Time Line
http://realityviews.blogspot.com/2010/06/bhopal-gas-tragedy-and-investigation.html

Reality views by sm-
Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Keyword Tag – Bhopal Gas Petition rejected

READ MORE - SC denies to change charge in Bhopal Case SC rejects CBI's curative petition seeking a stay on its 1996 judgment in the case

May 10, 2011

CPIL filed PIL in SC against pan masala Rajnigandha and Tulsi for selling pan masala in plastic sachets after ban

CPIL filed PIL in SC against pan masala Rajnigandha and Tulsi
for selling pan masala in plastic sachets after ban

In a blow to gutkha and pan masala manufacturers, the Supreme Court in December last had imposed a ban on the use of plastic in packaging of tobacco products and set March 1 as the deadline within which the tobacco manufacturers need to implement its order.


An NGO Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) has sought contempt action against Rajeev Kumar, Managing Director of Dharampal Satyapal group, for selling tobacco product in plastic cover in violation of the Supreme Court order.



CPIL said that despite the ban, the company has been selling its product -- Rajnigandha and Tulsi -- in plastic sachets and pleaded the court to initiate contempt proceedings against its MD.

Dharampal Satyapal Group (DS Group) is Approx Rs. 1600 crores

CPIL said that "Dharampal Satyapal group whose turnover runs into thousands of crores of rupees and which manufactures big brands like Rajnigandha and Tulsi is packing its products in plastic material even after March 1

CPIL also showed and annexed some samples of tobacco product with its petition.

"This, prima facie, amounts to a serious violation of court’s order and thus constitutes a contempt of court.
This violation by such a big group could not have been done without the tacit understanding with the enforcement agencies that no action would be taken against the business group," the PIL petition said.

CPIL approached the Supreme Court seeking contempt proceeding against the makers of pan masala Rajnigandha and Tulsi for marketing and selling their popular brands of tobacco products in plastic sachets despite a ban on its use.

The NGO CPIL sought contempt action against Ministry of Environment and Forests Secretary.

Suggested Reading –
Gutka will be sold in Plastic sachets –Rules will be amended by Government of India
http://realityviews.blogspot.com/2011/05/gutka-will-be-sold-in-plastic-sachets.html


Reality views by sm-
Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Keyword Tag - Rajnigandha Tulsi Pan Masala Contempt Notice

READ MORE - CPIL filed PIL in SC against pan masala Rajnigandha and Tulsi for selling pan masala in plastic sachets after ban

For Honour Killing give death Punishment Supreme Court Orders to lower courts

For Honour Killing give death Punishment Supreme Court Orders to lower courts
SC declares Honour Killing as Rarest of rare crime Orders lower Court to view honour killing cases as rarest of rare cases.

The Supreme Court on Monday said that honour killings fell in the category of rarest of rare crimes and those committing them deserved capital punishment.


Delhi Sessions Court gave life imprisonment to Bhagawan Dass.
Sessions Court found him guilty of killing his daughter Seema who had left her husband Raju and was living with her cousin, Sriniwas.

He filed appeal in the high court and High court also found him guilty and upholds the judgment of session’s court following which the convict appealed in the apex court.

After this Bhagawan Das filed an appeal but a bench of justices Markandeya Katju and Gyan Sudha Mishra dismissed his appeal and in a judgment bench said following,

"In our opinion honour killings, for whatever reason, come within the category of rarest of rare cases deserving death punishment.
It is time to stamp out these barbaric, feudal practices which are a slur on our nation

The court further added and held that honour killings as a slur on the nation, and terming it a barbaric, feudal practice that ought to be stamped out.

"This is necessary as a deterrent for such outrageous, uncivilized behavior.
All persons who are planning to perpetrate 'honour' killings should know that the gallows await them,"

"Often young couples who fall in love have to seek shelter in the police lines or protection homes, to avoid the wrath of kangaroo courts," Justice Katju writing the judgment said.

The Supreme Court today directed courts to view such cases as in "rarest of rare" category for awarding death penalty to the convicts.

Indian Court follows the principal of rarest of rare case while awarding a death punishment to any criminal.

The apex court while stating that such honour killings in future should be dealt with death penalty asked the registry to forward the copy of its today's judgments to all high courts, session’s courts, chief secretaries and DGPs of all States and Union Territories.

Thus now Supreme Court has made the road clear for lower courts to give or award death punishment in honor killing cases.

Suggested Reading –
Understanding Honor or Honour Killing – A social evil
http://realityviews.blogspot.com/2010/06/understanding-honor-or-honour-killing.html

Khap Panchayats are illegal and have to be ruthlessly stamped out – SC
http://realityviews.blogspot.com/2011/04/khap-panchayats-are-illegal-and-have-to.html


Reality views by sm-
Monday, May 09, 2011

Keyword Tag - Rarest of rare case Honor Killing

READ MORE - For Honour Killing give death Punishment Supreme Court Orders to lower courts

May 9, 2011

Supreme Court stays Ayodhya HC Order of Partition of disputed Ayodhya Land title suit

Supreme Court stays Ayodhya High Court Order of Partition of disputed
Ayodhya Land title suit

September last year Allahabad high court gave judgment verdict in the Ayodhya title suit

High Court ordered that each party – the Hindu Mahasabha, the Sunni Waqf Board and the Nirmohi Akhara -- would be entitled to one-third share of the disputed land, with Lord Ram's idol continuing to stay at the place where he was placed.

Justices Khan and Agarwal decreed that the 2.7 acre land comprising the disputed site should be divided into three equal parts and be given to the Sunni Waqf Board, Nirmohi Akhara and the party representing 'Ram Lala Virajman' (Ram deity).

The court dismissed the title suits of the Sunni Wakf Board and the Nirmohi Akhara. It also ordered that all parties would maintain status quo for three months.


This was the first hearing in the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court on Monday put a stay on the Allahabad high court order partitioning the disputed land in Ayodhya.

Supreme Court has ordered a stay on the Ayodhya Verdict, which involves the Babri Masjid-Ram Mandir case.


Supreme Court ordered, said that status quo as on January 1993 will be maintained.

"We are not disturbing anything which was going on", said a bench of Justices Aftab Alam and R M Lodha.

Supreme Court said that "How could the high court engineer something like partitioning of disputed land on its own"

Supreme Court said that No party to the Ayodhya Title suit demanded or prayed for it. The partition of disputed land has "opened a litany of litigation"

The court said puja can be performed on the disputed land, but banned religious activity on the surrounding 67 acres of land acquired by central government in 1993.

The Supreme Court of India issued notice to all parties on Allahabad high court judgment dividing the disputed land at Ayodhya

The Bench was hearing a batch of appeals filed by Nirmohi Akhara, Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha, Jamait Ulama-I-Hind and Sunni Central Wakf Board, besides the one filed on behalf of Bhagwan Ram Virajman.

Suggested Reading –

Complete Detailed Timeline, Chronology of Ayodhya Ram Mandir and Babri mosque Demolition –
http://realityviews.blogspot.com/2010/09/complete-detailed-timeline-chronology.html

Allahabad high court gives final judgment in Ayodhya case – Complete judgment of the Ayodhya case
http://realityviews.blogspot.com/2010/09/allahabad-high-court-gives-final.html


Reality Views by sm –
Monday, May 09, 2011

Keyword Tag - Allahabad high court, Ayodhya verdict, Ramjanmabhoomi, Supreme Court stays HC order, Supreme Court stays High Court verdict on land division

READ MORE - Supreme Court stays Ayodhya HC Order of Partition of disputed Ayodhya Land title suit

May 4, 2011

Gutka will be sold in Plastic sachets – Rules will be amended by Government of India

Gutka will be sold in Plastic sachets –
Rules will be amended by Government of India

February 18 – Supreme Court of India ordered that Gutka and pan masala will not be sold in plastic sachets from March 1.

After this Supreme Court order the environment ministry had banned packaging of
Gutka products in sachet.


But the news is that Government is willing and government is ready to bend before Rich Gutka King business people I read that Big Gangster, Terror D company is also involved this business in India. I am not sure about this .But Our Indian Gutka makers know him and he solves there fights.

On Tuesday Union environment and forests ministry proposed to ease its
Rules and allow packaging of gutka products in small sachet purely for export purposes.

Now environment ministry also has joined hands and proposed to amend the
Rules recently passed and allow gutka manufacturers to package their products in small sachet as long as they have export orders to meet.

The Karnataka government too had asked the environment ministry to ease the rules and
Allow manufacturing for export purposes.

I hope ministry will not allow this amendment.

What is the guarantee that on the name of exporting these small plastic packs will not be sold in India?

I feel that they will be sold in India also and abroad also.

Then will make fine of 1000 Rs. For violating export rule and selling small plastic sachets in India.
Such type of useless and toothless rule will be added to amendment and everyone will enjoy the life of corruption.

Good Rule and Punishment –
If export quality small plastic sachet found in India Automatically the license will be cancelled on the same day same minute.
After that company will prove that it’s not our pack which is sold in India until that period the company should be closed down without manufacturing a single pack.
A complete shutdown of Gutka Company and all branches and all offices.

A fine of 100 Crore Rupees or Jail term of 50 Years for all the directors of the company including sleeping partners of the company.

Say No to Gutka Plastic Packs.
Increases Taxes on Gutka.

February 18 – Supreme Court of India ordered that Gutka and pan masala will not be sold in plastic sachets from March 1.
To read full story here is the link –
Supreme Court Gives 2 days to Government to regulate the use of plastic for packaging gutka and tobacco products
http://realityviews.blogspot.com/2011/02/supreme-court-gives-2-days-to.html

Reality Views by sm-
Wednesday, May 04, 2011

Keyword Tag – Gutka Sachet Sold in small packs Karnataka

READ MORE - Gutka will be sold in Plastic sachets – Rules will be amended by Government of India

Apr 26, 2011

Supreme Court Cancels Airport Development Fee [ADF] Now Pay less for domestic and international air travel in Delhi and Mumbai

Supreme Court Cancels Airport Development Fee [ADF]
Now Pay less for domestic and international air travel in Delhi and Mumbai

SC Cancels airport development fee (ADF) being charged by private operators in Delhi and Mumbai –

The Supreme Court has stopped the Delhi and Mumbai airports from charging passengers what's known as an "Airport Development Fee."

Earlier, the Delhi High Court had in August 2009 rejected the petition of the NGO, ruling that private airport developers were free to charge ADF from passengers and that barring it would have damaging consequences for the Public Private Partnership Model.


The Supreme Court today quashed the levying of the Airport Development Fee by private airport developers in Delhi and Mumbai on international and domestic passengers.

The bench set aside the Delhi High Court's order which had upheld levying of ADF.

The court passed the order on a petition filed by the NGO, Consumer Online Foundation, contending that the fee was illegal, as it was not approved by Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India.

The NGO had pleaded that such levy can only be charged by a government body like the Airport Authority of India and not private bodies such as Delhi International Airport Ltd and Mumbai International Airport Ltd that are just managing the Airport.

A bench of Justices Cyriac Joseph and A K Patnaik set aside the policy of airport developers by which passengers departing from Delhi airport had to pay a fee of Rs 200 for domestic flights and Rs 1,300 for international flights.

Fliers departing from Mumbai were charged Rs 100 for domestic and Rs 600 for international flights.

As a result, tickets are likely to become cheaper by Rs.200 for domestic travelers and Rs.1, 300 for international passengers boarding from Delhi. Similarly, tickets from the Mumbai airport are also likely to become cheaper with varying rates.

Airport Ticket Officials at the Mumbai airport say the fees were built into tickets and will be deleted now.
They were charging Rs. 100 as a "departure fee" for domestic travel and Rs. 600 for international travel.


Reality Views by sm –
Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Keyword Tag – ADF cancel Mumbai Delhi Air Travelers pay less Air Travel become Cheap

READ MORE - Supreme Court Cancels Airport Development Fee [ADF] Now Pay less for domestic and international air travel in Delhi and Mumbai

Apr 15, 2011

RTI Application Reveals truth Indian Politicians, MPs, MLAs have no duties and responsibilities

RTI Application Reveals truth Indian Politicians, MPs, MLAs
have no duties and responsibilities

As a Citizen of India
Do you know what are the duties and responsibilities of Indian Elected MPs, MLAs or in simple language say Politician?

Indian Politicians have no duty and no responsibility and no accountability.


RTI applications were filed in the central government and state assemblies and after getting the replies it is now clear that there are no duties and responsibilities for elected representatives of the people.

February 2, 2009 -
Activist Dev Ashish Bhattacharya filed RTI application with the Election Commission seeking details of duties, responsibilities and accountability of MPs and MLAs.

Election Commission replied that it was "not concerned with information sought" and it had no such information.

Then appeal was filed.

The commission's appellate authority ruled that the query should have been transferred to the ministry of parliamentary affairs and ministry of law and justice.

June 3, 2009

Lok Sabha secretariat replied that there is no provision either in the Constitution or the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha defining duties and responsibilities of members of Parliament or through which the accountability can be fixed on non-performing MPs".

Bihar assembly –

Bihar assembly replied that "there is no provision/rule through which the duties, responsibilities and accountabilities of MLAs are fixed". And there was "no provision in the law through which accountability can be fixed" on non-performing MLAs

West Bengal assembly-

West Bengal assembly public information officer replied that they too didn't have any specific rules "through which the responsibility and accountability can be fixed".

Haryana Vidhan Sabha –

Haryana Vidhan Sabha secretariat replied that there were no specific acts defining the duties of MLAs

Assam assembly –

Assam assembly replied that it does not have specific rules.
Kerala assembly-
Kerala assembly replied that in this regard no specific statute has so far been enacted by the Kerala legislative assembly".

For six months The President's secretariat did not answer the query RTI application now The President's secretariat has referred the RTI application to the ministries of law and justice and parliamentary affairs

On February 18, the ministry of law and justice referred the matter to parliamentary affairs, which is yet to reply to the RTI.

Sikkim- It has a basic rule nominal duty
Sikkim provision says, "It will be their prime duty to maintain communal harmony and peace among the people of their respective constituencies."

Now Wake up India and Support Anna Hazare and show such a support that every demand of Anna will become the law.

If you do not agree with Anna then let me know the solution if you do not have solution then support Anna Hazare.

Reality Views by sm –
Friday, April 15, 2011

Keywords Tags - MP MLA No Duty No Responsibility MP MLA Reason for Salary

READ MORE - RTI Application Reveals truth Indian Politicians, MPs, MLAs have no duties and responsibilities

Infolinks In Text Ads

Total Pageviews

Powered by Blogger.

Dont Forget To Follow Us